\n Your contribution helps us keep the service running — and as a thank you, you\'ll receive an Ad-Free Account.\n
\n Learn more about how your donation supports us.\n
edited by Gaby Clark, reviewed by Andrew Zinin
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
Add as preferred source Credit: Matheus Bertelli from Pexels Users who participate in online communities linked to conspiracy theories show distinctive linguistic characteristics even when discussing apparently neutral topics, such as films, music, cooking or science, and even before they take part in conspiracy communities.
This is what emerges from a study by Politecnico di Milano, authored by Francesco Corso and Francesco Pierri of the Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering at Politecnico di Milano, together with Giuseppe Russo (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) and Gianmarco De Francisci Morales (CENTAI Institute).
The researchers used psycholinguistic analysis tools and artificial intelligence models on 500 million comments posted in more than 20 large Reddit communities. The aim was to verify whether it was possible to distinguish users active in the r/conspiracy community from other users on the platform, observing only their language in mainstream contexts.
The results show that these users display recognizable linguistic signals with an average accuracy of 87%, even years before their explicit participation in conspiracy communities. Among the most recurring linguistic elements are a greater presence of anger, anxiety, and references to conflict, illness and death, as well as more frequent use of aggressive or emotionally charged language.
The study also shows, however, that there is no single "conspiratorial language": Users adapt their communicative style to different online social contexts. Models developed specifically for individual communities are much more effective than a general model valid for the entire platform.
The research from Politecnico di Milano has been accepted for presentation at ACL 2026 (Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics), one of the leading international conferences in the field of artificial intelligence and natural language processing. The paper is published on the arXiv preprint server.
"In this work, we wanted to understand whether involvement in conspiracy communities leaves recognizable linguistic traces even outside the spaces in which these theories are explicitly discussed," explains Francesco Corso, a Ph.D. candidate at the Data Science Lab at Politecnico di Milano and an author of the study.
"The results suggest that there is no single conspiratorial language valid for the entire platform. Users adapt their way of expressing themselves to the norms of different online communities, and this makes it necessary to design analysis and moderation tools that are more sensitive to context," adds Francesco Pierri, assistant professor at the Data Science Lab.
Building on this study, the research continued with a second paper, accepted at the 20th edition of the AAAI International Conference on Web and Social Media, on the Jeffrey Epstein case.
In this study, the authors analyze the impact of a sudden increase in the visibility of the r/conspiracy community, showing that mainstream exposure can attract many new users but does not necessarily produce their lasting integration into the community.
The research contributes to understanding radicalization processes and the dynamics of the spread of conspiracy narratives online, highlighting the need to develop moderation and monitoring systems capable of taking into account the differences among digital communities.
Francesco Corso et al, Among Us: Language of Conspiracy Theorists on Mainstream Reddit, arXiv (2025). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2506.05086
Provided by Polytechnic University of Milan
MA in English, copy editor since 2021 with experience in higher education and health content. Dedicated to trustworthy science news. Full profile
Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X's editorial success. Full profile
Users active in conspiracy-related Reddit communities exhibit distinctive linguistic patterns, including increased expressions of anger, anxiety, and references to conflict, illness, and death, even in neutral contexts and prior to explicit participation. No universal "conspiratorial language" exists; users adapt their style to each community, necessitating context-sensitive moderation tools. Mainstream exposure increases community visibility but does not ensure lasting user integration.
This summary was automatically generated using LLM. Full disclaimer
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.
Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.
We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account.
